A federal jury in Miami ruled that Tesla was 33% liable for a 2019 fatal crash involving its Autopilot system. The company has been ordered to pay approximately $242.5 million—a share of $329 million in total damages—to the victim’s family and injured survivor. Tesla plans to appeal.
In a landmark ruling, a Miami federal jury has found Tesla partially liable in a 2019 crash involving its Autopilot driver‑assistance system that left one person dead and another severely injured Reddit+15Reuters+15TT News+15TT News+8CNBC+8Investors+8The Daily Beast+2Quartz+2The Times of India+2. The decision marks the first time Tesla has lost a fatal Autopilot case at trial.
Crash Background
On
April 25, 2019, George McGee was driving a 2019 Tesla Model S at around
62 mph near
Key Largo, Florida. While using Enhanced Autopilot, he glanced down to pick up a dropped cellphone. Believing the system would brake for obstacles, McGee drove through a stop sign and collided with a parked Chevrolet Tahoe.
22‑year‑old Naibel Benavides Leon was killed; her boyfriend,
Dillon Angulo, suffered traumatic brain injury and multiple fractures
Quartzhttps://www.13abc.com+14KTVZ+14WRAL.com+14.
Liability and Damages Awarded
The jury allocated
33% responsibility to Tesla for the crash
CNBC. The total damages awarded were
$329 million, comprised of
$129 million in compensatory damages and
$200 million in punitive damages
The Times of India+15Reuters+15Business Insider+15. Based on Tesla’s share and the damages cap, the company is expected to pay approximately
$242.5 million—including all punitive damages and its portion of the compensatory award
https://www.newschannel10.com+6CNBC+6Investors+6.
Plaintiffs’ Allegations and Evidence
Attorneys for the plaintiffs argued that
Tesla’s Autopilot was used on roads it wasn’t designed for, and that the company
misled consumers about its safety. They also accused Tesla of initially withholding critical pre-crash data and video, which was later retrieved by forensic experts
Reddit+5Quartz+5The Daily Beast+5.
Tesla’s Response
Tesla has strongly disagreed with the verdict, calling it “wrong” and saying it undermines
automotive safety innovation across the industry. The company maintains that
driver error alone caused the crash and says
no vehicle in 2019—or today—could have prevented it. Tesla says it intends to appeal the decision based on alleged legal errors in the trial process
CNBC+1WXYZ 7 News Detroit+1.
Wider Implications
Legal and safety analysts believe this verdict could
open the floodgates to more trials and larger settlements involving Autopilot—and other driver-assistance systems—by setting a precedent that manufacturers can be held liable for misuse beyond conventional limits
https://www.13abc.comhttps://www.kktv.comQuartzBusiness Insider. The case also coincides with
increasing regulatory scrutiny, including investigations by the
NHTSA and ongoing policy debates over reporting requirements for crashes involving advanced driver-assist systems
Reddit.
Market Reaction
Following the verdict,
Tesla’s stock dropped by approximately 1.8%, contributing to a weekly decline of around 4.25%. Concerns about Tesla’s safety record and the future of its
robotaxi service rollout appear to be weighing on investor sentiment
Investors.
